About a year ago, lawyers and attorneys-at-law dealing with civil cases started exchanging news like this: "Attention. Court X in the city of Y is of the opinion that a copy of the application for the justification of the judgment should be served not only on the court, but also on the attorney of the opposing party! "
Each attorney immediately understood the dangers of this. Everyone also believed that it was an absurd concept (hence the replies to these text messages or alarming e-mails contained many epithets that we will not quote here). Some recalled that a similarly absurd view had arisen more than 15 years earlier, but was eventually eliminated by Supreme Court jurisprudence. And now, finally, the same happened, because there were too many arguments against him. However, the trauma remained and some attorneys still send each other copies of these applications, because due to the number of similar absurdities in the last dozen or so years, as well as due to the uncertainty of the law, there remained a subconscious fear that suddenly some court in Poland would come up with the idea of however, make the attorney a heart attack and return to this nonsensical concept. So such a shy appeal to those who apply the law: Let us not overdo it with formalism. Let's respect each other. The rational interpretation really works.